NWO Now and Then



New World Order and Cross-Corporate Directorships

Here's a quick clip from the movie "The Network" to get you warmed up:



This clip brings to mind a quote that I posted in a previous blog:

"Round Tablers fanned out throughout the world to take control of fiscal and monetary policies and political leadership in all countries where they operated." Setting an example for today's interlocking corporate directorships and tax-exempt foundations, "The Round Table itself consists of a maze of companies, institutions, banks and educational establishments, which in itself would take qualified insurance actuaries a year to sort out,"
British Intelligence Officer Dr. John Coleman

And this quote from Dr. Carroll Quigley (also mentioned in a previous blog):

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups." Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University

Elucidation
























What I would be truly curious to see is a comprehensive study of how extensive this web of interlocking directorships and corporate ownership goes. A pair of physicists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich did a just that. The completed study has yet to be published, but here is what we know so far. This was posted on Washington's blog on 8/28/09:

"Inside Science - a news service supported by the American Institute of Physics - is breaking an important story:
A recent analysis of the 2007 financial markets of 48 countries has revealed that the world's finances are in the hands of just a few mutual funds, banks, and corporations. This is the first clear picture of the global concentration of financial power, and point out the worldwide financial system's vulnerability as it stood on the brink of the current economic crisis.

A pair of physicists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich did a physics-based analysis of the world economy as it looked in early 2007. Stefano Battiston and James Glattfelder extracted the information from the tangled yarn that links 24,877 stocks and 106,141 shareholding entities in 48 countries, revealing what they called the "backbone" of each country's financial market. These backbones represented the owners of 80 percent of a country's market capital, yet consisted of remarkably few shareholders.

"You start off with these huge national networks that are really big, quite dense," Glattfelder said. “From that you're able to ... unveil the important structure in this original big network. You then realize most of the network isn't at all important."

The most pared-down backbones exist in Anglo-Saxon countries, including the U.S., Australia, and the U.K. ... But while each American company may link to many owners, Glattfelder and Battiston's analysis found that the owners varied little from stock to stock, meaning that comparatively few hands are holding the reins of the entire market.

“If you would look at this locally, it's always distributed,” Glattfelder said. “If you then look at who is at the end of these links, you find that it's the same guys, [which] is not something you'd expect from the local view.”


Matthew Jackson, an economist from Stanford University in Calif. who studies social and economic networks, said that Glattfelder and Battiston's approach could be used to answer more pointed questions about corporate control and how companies interact.

"It's clear, looking at financial contagion and recent crises, that understanding interrelations between companies and holdings is very important in the future,” he said. "Certainly people have some understanding of how large some of these financial institutions in the world are, there's some feeling of how intertwined they are, but there's a big difference between having an impression and actually having ... more explicit numbers to put behind it"...

The results will be published in an upcoming issue of the journal Physical Review E.
The physicists name names. As Inside Science notes:
Based on their analysis, Glattfelder and Battiston identified the ten investment entities who are “big fish” in the most countries. The biggest fish was the Capital Group Companies, with major stakes in 36 of the 48 countries studied.
While it is true that the paper in the Physical Review E has not yet been published, I have found a draft version of their article from February which shows that the top 10 list of most powerful financial institutions (from most to least powerful) is as follows:
1. The Capital Group of Companies

2. Fidelity Management & Research

3. Barclays PLC

4. Franklin Resources

5. AXA

6. JP Morgan Chase

7. Dimensional Fund Advisors

8. Merrill Lynch

9. Wellington Management Company

10. UBS
Other tidbits:
  • Non-American players Deutsche Bank, Brandes Investment Partners, Societe Generale, Credit Suisse, Schroders PLC and Allianz are also in the top 21 positions.
  • The government of Singapore is number 25.
  • The world's largest banking group - HSBC Holdings PLC - only chimes in at number 26.
The data analyzed in the study is from 2007, and the playing field may have changed substantially since then.

Further analysis using this new methodology may yield important information. For example, given the massive government intervention in the markets, it is important to ask who controls stock now."

Directors sitting on the board of a corporation are elected by the shareholders of said corporation. A small group of stockholders can control the board's membership if they own enough shares.

It seems to me that you can't get anywhere on the global stage until you have been elected to sit on the board of a major corporation. Once you gain that position, you have inside information as to how that corporation works. Now you are valuable to the global elitist community and you can get elected to more boards and perhaps even get membership to the Council on Foreign Relations. From that point, many more doors will open up for you so long as you continue to subscribe to the ideologies of those stockholders who got you elected to these boards and of course that you continue to pursue policies complementary to those pursued by the CFR and other globalist organizations. It all starts with these interlocking directorships though. Even CIA directors and high ranking Freemasons need to sit on a board or two if they want to become a major player on the world stage. The stockholders electing these directors remain anonymous by casting their votes through agents (law firms, trustees, ect). For more on this subject of interlocking directorships and the connections between government agencies, corporate boards, and the small group of stockholders acting as puppet masters for the whole system, please read Eustace Mullins' "World Order" by clicking here and downloading the book as a pdf.

Endgame


The first portion of this documentary concentrates on the Bilderberg group meeting in Ottawa, Canada back in 2006. This documentary offers an abundance good information regarding the history of this secretive organization.

Alex Jones spends a great deal of time talking about the North American Union (NAU) in this documentary. The NAU has not come to pass as of yet, and some researchers have claimed that the Bilderberg Group has put the idea on hold.



Click here to go to Judicial Watch's webpage posting the documents they uncovered through their Freedom of Information Act request.

Margaret Sanger was issued a grant in 1923 by John D. Rockefeller, Jr.'s Bureau of Social Hygiene from 1924 onwards, which were made anonymously to avoid public exposure of the Rockefeller name to her agenda. The family also consistently supported her ongoing efforts in regard to population control. --- (Crucial, anonymous Rockefeller grants to the Clinical Research Bureau and support for population control — see John Ensor Harr, and Peter J. Johnson. The Rockefeller Century: Three Generations of America's Greatest Family. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1988. (pp. 191, 461-62))

From 1939 to 1942, she was an honorary delegate of the Birth Control Federation of America, which included a supervisory role with the Negro Project, alongside Mary Lasker and Clarence Gamble.[14] From 1952 to 1959, she served as president of the International Planned Parenthood Federation; at the time, the largest private international "family planning" organization.

See this web page below regarding her Eugenics work in "The Negro Project". This is the kind of ideology the Rockefellers choose to fund.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2401714/posts

Her other outfit the "Birth Control Federation of America" (BCFA) was vested with promotion of birth control and sterilization in the African American community. Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, of the soap-manufacturing company Procter and Gamble, was nominated to be the BCFA regional director of the South. Gamble wrote a memorandum in November 1939 entitled “Suggestions for the Negro Project,” in which he recognized that “black leaders might regard birth control as an extermination plot.” Gamble suggested that black leaders be placed in positions where it would appear they were in charge. Yet Sanger's reply reflects Gamble's ambivalence about having blacks in authoritative positions:

“I note that you doubt it worthwhile to employ a full-time Negro physician. It seems to me from my experience ... that, while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors, they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table, which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts. They do not do this with white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the clinic, he can go among them with enthusiasm and ... knowledge, which ... will have far-reaching results among the colored people.”

Sanger knew blacks were a religious people—and how useful ministers would be to her project. In the context of summoning the support of "intellectuals" in launching her "Negro Project" (1939) she wrote in the same letter to Gamble:

“The minister's work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

Please see the articles below in regards to the Nazi connection to US Eugenics researchers:

'The American Breed': Nazi Eugenics and the Origins of the Pioneer Fund
Paul A. Lombardo
Georgia State University - College of Law


http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=313820##

In 1904 the Cold Springs Harbor Research Facility [Station for Experimental Evolution at Cold Spring Harbor] was founded by Charles Davenport with funding from Carnagie, Rockefeller, and Harriman. By 1907 the first forced sterelization laws were on the books. Then from 1910-1940 it was also the location of the Eugenics Record Office, this was also created by Davenport. He was assisted by Harry H. Laughlin, who later was sent to advise Hitler’s Germans. The Eugenics office was directly sponsored by Mrs. Harriman. Alexander Graham Bell was the first director.

Here's a good article form the New York Times published in 1913 offering more background on the Eugenics Record Office established by Mrs. Harriman.

Here's what Julian Huxley said in regards to using UNESCO to further Eugenics policy:

http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Global_Governance_1.htm

The ink on the UN Charter had not yet dried when the Charter for UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) was presented in London, November, 1945. UNESCO swallowed and expanded the Paris-based International Institute for Intellectual Cooperation which was a holdover from the League of Nations. Julian Huxley was the prime mover of UNESCO and served as its first Director-General. Huxley had served on Britain's Population Investigation Commission before World War II and was vice president of the Eugenics Society from 1937 to 1944. In a 1947 document entitled
UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy, Huxley wrote:
“Thus even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”19
Huxley believed the world needed a single, global government. He saw UNESCO as an instrument to “help in the speedy and satisfactory realization of the process.” He described UNESCO's philosophy as global, scientific humanism. He said: “Political unification in some sort of world government will be required for the definitive attainment” of the next stage of social development.21 From the beginning, UNESCO has designed programs to capture children at the earliest possible age to begin the educational process.

Aldous Huxley - Brave New World

Aldous Huxley, the author of Brave New World, is the brother of Julian Huxley. If you have never read Brave New World, here it is. It is a must read for all truth-seekers.






You can also find the entire book posted online by clicking the link below. You can print it out for easier reading:

http://huxley.net/bnw/one.html

Here is a transcript of the speech that Huxley gave in Berkley in 1962:

Aldous Huxley Speech The Ultimate Revolution 20 03 1962

"It seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: That we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude."

Brave New World Revisited is posted online in it's entirety by clicking the link below. In this book, Huxley unveils his proposal for a scientific dictatorship:

http://www.huxley.net/bnw-revisited/index.html

Here is an excellent article on the occult connection to Huxley's scientific dictatorship:

http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Ascendancy.htm


In case you skipped this article, here's the last few paragraphs which I think are essential to our discussion of Aldous Huxley and his role in the NWO. It also ties in with our earlier theme of an occult connection to modern politics:

"It was the grandfather of Aldous Huxley, T.H. Huxley, who would act as the 'official spokesman for the recluse Darwin' (White, 268). Many years later, Aldous would propose a 'scientific dictatorship' in Brave New World Revisited. Whether Aldous made this proposition on a whim or was penning a concept that had circulated within the Huxley family for years cannot be determined. Given the family's oligarchical tradition, the latter assertion remains a definite possibility. Yet, there may be a deeper Freemasonic connection, suggesting that the concept of a 'scientific dictatorship' may have originated within the Lodge.

T.H. Huxley was a Freemason and, with no apparent achievements to claim as his own, was made a Fellow of the Royal Society at the age of 26 (Daniel, 34). T.H. Huxley tutored Freemason H.G. Wells, who would later teach Huxley's two grandsons, Julian and Aldous. Both Julian and Aldous were Freemasons (Daniel, 147). Given this continuity of Freemasonic tutelage within the Huxley family, it is a definite possibility that the Huxlian concept of a 'scientific dictatorship' is really Masonic. Considering Freemason H.G. Wells' endorsement of a 'scientific dictatorship,' which he called a 'Technocracy,' this is highly likely.
The rest is history. With the publicity campaigns of the Royal Society and the avid defense of evolution apologist T.H. Huxley, Darwin's theory would be disseminated and popularized. The seed had taken root and, in the years to come, numerous permutations of the elite's 'scientific dictatorship' would emerge."

Here is the article referenced in "Endgame" titled: US planes sprayed Wiltshire with Sarin:

Here are the articles referenced in "Endgame" in regard to child pre-crime:
Here is National Security Memorandum 200 written in 1974 in regard to world population strategy written by the National Security Council.

Here are the excerpts from the UN Global Biodiversity Assessment referred in "Endgame":

States that the human population has exceeded earth's biosphere capacity and set the parameters for recovery; "[It is] estimated that an 'agricultural world' in which most human beings are peasants should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people....In contrast, a reasonable estimate for an industrialised world society at the present north American material standard of living would be 1 billion." (1) (note: there are presently 6 billion people on earth.)

There is no discussion in the GBA of how 2/3 of the earth's human population might be eliminated, but it does give some clues. Agricultural practices are sharply condemned, "Overwhelming evidence leads to the conclusion that modern commercial agriculture has had a direct negative impact on biodiversity at all levels.... Agriculture may be one of the most important causes of pollution, by the production of sediments, by the generation of chemical wastes, or by the use of pesticides."(2) Never mind that US agricultural practices have reduced these impacts to all time lows.

The use of fertilizers would be sharply reduced if the GBA recommendations were implemented, in spite of the realization "that fertilisers have played an essential part in producing the world's harvests is undisputed. [It] is estimated that if the use of fertilisers ceased, the world's harvests would be cut almost in half. "(3) Although the GBA does not say it, cutting the world's food production in half would certainly produce massive starvation and pestilence and cut human population by at least half.
1. Ibid, Section 11.2.3.2 pp 773.
2. Ibid, Section 11.2.2.2.3, pp 744
3. Ibid, Section 11.2.2.5, pp 761.

Here is an article backing up what Alex Jones says about the military dumping millions of pounds of never gas into the ocean along the east coast titled "The Deadliness Below"

"The Army now admits that it secretly dumped 64 million pounds of nerve and mustard agents into the sea, along with 400,000 chemical-filled bombs, land mines and rockets and more than 500 tons of radioactive waste - either tossed overboard or packed into the holds of scuttled vessels."

Here is the article by Sun Micro Systems founder Bill Joy entitled "Why the future doesn't need us"

In the article he references Ray Kurzweil whose quote about world government appeared at the beginning of the clip.

"Ray and I were both speakers at George Gilder's Telecosm conference, and I encountered him by chance in the bar of the hotel after both our sessions were over. I was sitting with John Searle, a Berkeley philosopher who studies consciousness. While we were talking, Ray approached and a conversation began, the subject of which haunts me to this day.
I had missed Ray's talk and the subsequent panel that Ray and John had been on, and they now picked right up where they'd left off, with Ray saying that the rate of improvement of technology was going to accelerate and that we were going to become robots or fuse with robots or something like that, and John countering that this couldn't happen, because the robots couldn't be conscious."

Obama Deception



Here is some further background and the full text of Executive Order 11110 signed by John F. Kennedy which allowed the Treasure to print silver certificates to be circulated as currency, thereby circumventing the Federal Reserve's money creation authority.

Here is the Financial Times article entitled "And now for a world government" calling for more global governance.

Here is an article supporting the idea that Obama and Clinton made a visit to the Bilderberg meeting in 2008 entitled "Hillary and Obama In Secret Bilderberg Rendezvous".

This article from Feb 27, 2008 entitled "Obama staffer gave warning of NAFTA rhetoric" says:

"Barack Obama has ratcheted up his attacks on NAFTA, but a senior member of his campaign team told a Canadian official not to take his criticisms seriously, CTV News has learned.

The staff member reassured Wilson that the criticisms would only be campaign rhetoric, and should not be taken at face value."

This LA Times article entitled "Obama preserves renditions as counter terrorism tool" dated 2/1/09 says:

"Under executive orders issued by Obama recently, the CIA still has authority to carry out what are known as renditions, secret abductions and transfers of prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States."

Here is the article entitled "Obama Endorses Bush Secrecy on Torture and Rendition" dated 2/4/09.

Here is the article entitled "Raytheon lobbyist picked for deputy Defense post" dated 1/23/09

"The Obama administration waives a new ethics rule in nominated William Lynn III, raising concerns.

The new ethics rules banned lobbyists from serving in the administration. But the executive order allowed waivers to let some former lobbyists take government jobs if doing so was in the public interest.

Raytheon, one of the five largest U.S. defense contractors, is a key supplier of missiles and radar to the military. The Waltham, Mass.-based company also produces components of the missile defense system."

The Bloomberg article referenced in the above titled "U.S. Taxpayers Risk $9.7 Trillion on Baulout Programs" Was updated on March 31, 2009 and was re-named "Financial Rescue Nears GDP as Pledges Top $12.8 Trillion ".

At about 15:00 in the above clip, the term "derivatives" is introduced. This topic will be extensively covered in the Modern Financial Crisis blog.

Here is the article referenced in the above clip titled "Fed Refuses to Disclose Recipients of $2 Trillion" Bloomberg filed a Freedom of Information Act request in 2009 to find out which firms received $2 Trillion in emergency loans from the Federal Reserve. The request was originally refused by the Fed, so Bloomberg sued...and won.

Here is an article from Zerohedge.com (an excellent resource for real financial/economic information) detailing the outcome of the case "Federal Reserve Loses Bloomberg FOIA Lawsuit, Sensitive Disclosures Forthcoming". Here's the order issued by District Judge Loretta Preska:

"The Board's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Bloomberg's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Specifically:
1. The Board shall produce forwith the Remaining Term Reports within five business days of the date hereof;
2. The Board shall search forthwith records at the FRBNY that constitute "Records of the Board" within the meaning of 12 C.F.R. # 231.2(i)(1); and
3. The parties shall confer following their review of the results of the search and inform the Court by letter no later than September 14, 2009 how they propose to proceed."
As of today (1/24/10), these disclosures have not been made and nothing has been reported in the mainstream media as to the status of this case. The judge gave the Federal Reserve 5 days to make the information available to Bloomberg. That judgment took place on 8/24/09 and still no disclosures have been made. What the hell happened? Why is Bloomberg remaining silent on this?

Here is the Bloomberg article referenced in the above clip titled "IMF Says Advanced Economies Already in Depression"

Here is the Time Magazine article referenced in the above clip titled "New World Order".

Here is the Newsweek article referenced in the above clip titled "Why We Need A Global Central Bank".

I chose not to source all the material referenced in the above clip regarding the carbon tax issue because none of it has come to fruition so far, and I don't believe that it will happen any time soon. I say this because after this documentary came out, the whole climate-gate issue forced global warming to the bottom of the agenda. Also, I don't think that the public would tolerate these proposed taxes as of right now. There would have to be an all out propaganda blitz to get the public on board, and this blitz has not yet been initiated. At the same time, I think these carbon taxes are inevitable, but the timetable is going to be much longer than what the video implies.

I would also like to mention here that I am not in the camp that regards global warming to be fraudulent. I don't whole heatedly believe that global warming is entirely caused by human activity either. I have my doubts on both sides of the debate. I chose not to investigate thoroughly for a reason.

My logic is this; Let's say that global warming is entirely man-made. How would we go about finding a solution to this problem?. I see 2 paths that we could take in addressing this hypothetical crisis. The first path involves massive economic contraction through taxation of carbon emissions. These taxes would have to be crippling in order to reduce carbon emissions enough to curb man-made global warming. Corporations would pass these costs down to consumers who would experience massive increases in the cost of living. Our species' ability to feed its 6 billion members is entirely dependent on the burning of fossil fuels. The increase in the costs agricultural inputs due to carbon taxes would be passed along to consumers. As we have seen in the past couple of years, the global economy is extremely fragile. This shock will ultimately eliminate consumers' "disposable income" causing economies all over the world to collapse. Millions (perhaps even billions) would die from starvation and illness. The middle class would be plunged into poverty and those who were already living in poverty would probably die. All human progress would halt and chaos would eventually reign. This path will stop global warming, but the cost would be catastrophic.


The other path involves technological progress. If our species were able to free itself from the tyranny of central bankers, we would experience a flood of capital supporting productive ideas all over the world. See my solution to the fractional reserve banking issue (Democratic Capitalism) for more background on this subject. These ideas would not have to be profitable to corporations in order to obtain funding under a Democratic Capitalist system. The governments of the world (now having the ability to print their own money interest free), would have the ability to fund projects (under the direction of the people) that would either reverse global warming, or allow us to adapt and thrive in our new "warmer" world.

Both of these paths involve risk, but I would chose to err on the side of human ingenuity. That being the case, I think the biggest hurdle we have to overcome in order to find a solution to man-made global warming (in our hypothetical scenario where there is conclusive proof that the phenomena is caused by human activity), is the elimination of central/fractional reserve banking and the implementation of Democratic Capitalism
Having said that, I think it is clear that truth-seekers should focus on the elimination of fractional reserve and central banking whether or not global warming is man-made...unless of course you want to go down path 1. I assure you that unless you are one of the elite, path 1 will be horrifying journey. It is clear to me that path 2 is the reasonable choice.

Here is the article referenced in the above clip titled "Pentagon Plans to Keep 20,000 Troops Inside US to Bolster Domestic Security"

Here is the article referenced in the above clip titled "Brigade Homeland Tours Start Oct. 1"

Here is the article referenced in the above clip titled "New Legislation Authorizes FEMA Camps in U.S."

Here is the article referenced in the above clip titled "Defense Department Establishes Civilian Expeditionary Workforce"

Here is the executive order titled "National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 51". What I found most disturbing about this directive is their definition of a "Catastrophic Emergency":

"(b) "Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions;" 

This definition is so broad, that just about any emergency can be classified as "catastrophic", thereby allowing the executive branch to assume complete control over the federal government.

Agenda 21



For more background on the Wildlands Project, click here.

Here is some information on UNESCO's declaration of "The Decade of Education for Sustainable Development".

At about 6:50 in the above clip, we find that the new Mathematics curriculum says that Math is arbitrary and arrived at by consensus. If you have never read 1984 by George Orwell, stop everything you're doing and go read it RIGHT NOW! In this epic story, the government becomes so powerful that they are able to convince the dumbed down population that the state was the gatekeeper of truth. Because the state is infallible, any axiom it declares, no matter how ridiculous, would immediately be accepted as fact by the dumbed down population. If the state declared that for today and today only that 2+2=5, no ordinary person would question it. This is because the average person has no concept of objectivity outside of the government. The only objective truth they know is that the state is infallible. This concept parallels the concept of "Math by Consensus" described above. All you have to do is replace the "State" described in 1984 with the "Experts" referred to in the new mathematical curriculum above and you have the foundation of a truly Orwellian society. 
At about 8:30, the lecturer in the above clip proclaims Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development to be an attack on the American lifestyle. I want to make it clear that I believe that the American lifestyle of gluttony and apathy needs to change in order for humanity to survive. We need to cut back on consumption and find more efficient and effective ways of utilizing resources. Having said that, I also believe that this change by force is not sustainable either. Agenda 21 is a tool to one day (perhaps today?) be used by the elite to suppress freedom and individuality under the cover of environmental protection. Any plan to save humanity by suppressing humanity's natural desires for freedom and creativity is doomed to failure. Only our ingenuity can save us and only a system which encourages freedom can spur the creativity we need in order to find solutions to the fundamental problem of exponential growth (please watch the entire lecture posted below for background on the seriousness of this greatest threat to the survivability of our species). 

Suppression of freedom (economic, social, and political freedom) is suppression of creativity. Democratic Capitalism would be the first step toward developing the type of system we are suggesting. Unless we experience world-wide comprehensive monetary reform, humanity will never be free (see the Money as Debt blog). Modern money mechanics are a key tool used by the elite to control the masses. Since the necessary overhaul of this system would put the elites' status in jeopardy, they came up with a totalitarian system in order to save humanity from the forces of exponential growth. More humane approaches toward solving this problem would surely cripple their control over the resources of the planet.


The lecture below paints a bleak picture of the consequences of exponential growth. Once you have listened to the entire lecture you will know why the elite are so obsessed with depopulation programs.

Fall of the Republic

A large amount of subject matter that is presented in this documentary will be extensively covered in the Modern Financial Crisis blog. Also, please see the Money As Debt blog for more background...if you haven't already.